There are many many subjects I know nothing about; nothing of real significance that is, other than vague generalities and oversimplifications. For instance, I’m clueless about architecture and how to read a blueprint. I’m clueless about farming and how or when to plant certain crops, how to keep up the soil, when to harvest, etc. I’m also clueless about rugby or cricket and their rules! I’m clueless on how best to perform medical operations; I’m not a board certified doctor! There are many subjects I just don’t know enough about to carry-on any type of extended intelligent conversation!
So here are my questions to the cyber-world:
Is it wise to speak overtly, to be long-winded about things one knows very little or nothing about?
Why is it every two & four years — the American political cycle — everyone knows EVERYTHING about the dynamics of governing 319-million diverse people, or in my state of Texas 27-million, and are suddenly experts on ALL factors that effect people’s needs and wants and their current and future well-being? How do they have all the solutions!? What’s their secret? I want to know!
And now for some comic relief with much “truthiness”… 😀
(paragraph break)
Live Well — Love Much — Laugh Often — Learn Always
Blog content with this logo by Professor Taboo is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://professortaboo.com/.
‘Everyone knows everything about the dynamics …’
Dearest Professor, I think you mean ‘all Americans know everything about …’
After all, there are users of the Internet, though it may shock you deeply to learn this, who do not hail from America. Yes, even in the underdeveloped countries of Europe, we do occasionally go online. (I won’t bother adding the Brits invented it even though Americans claim they did.)
However, the answer is no, it is not wise.
For example, take this supposedly contradictory comment I read earlier today:
‘I don’t eat meat but I’m not vegetarian.’
That makes perfect sense to me. The speaker could easily be pescatarian or eat chicken (which is not meat). However, it was meant to be an analogy to: ‘I’m Christian but I’m not religious,’ (or something similar) ie contradictory/nonsensical/whatever.
The moral of that story is, don’t talk about vegetarian issues, or feminism, or various other isms near roughseas if one doesn’t know one’s arse from one’s elbow. Or one’s flesh, from one’s fish or one’s fowl.
I do hope you didn’t expect me to comment on the circus in your country? I know my limitations!
Nice to see you are still, if fleetingly, around.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You believe all Americans are like that? Ouch. 😦
LikeLike
No I was being teasy.
LikeLike
Oh, ok. I only just started on my first cup of coffee. Not quite awake. Was up late last night. Brain not fully online yet to detect teasy. 🙂
LikeLike
Kate, from what I gathered, he was speaking of politicians claiming to know everything.
Professor, correct me if I misunderstood.
LikeLiked by 2 people
He said everyone. So therefore, I figured he meant … everyone. After all, politicians always claim to know everything. Don’t they?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, I watched the video, so I was assuming he meant politicians, not all Americans.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kate, I stand corrected. I was just on Facebook, where he did a short intro of this post, and apparently he did mean “everyone”, excluding himself, of course. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Far be it from me to increase his ego, but he’s not usually imprecise with his vocabulary. 😀
LikeLiked by 2 people
*snorts*
LikeLiked by 1 person
When he included the video, I thought he was referring to politicians who come across as knowing the “dynamics of governing 319-million diverse people”.
Far be it for me to understand what goes on in his gray matter stew of his. 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
* snorts back *
I have a vision of thick swirling pea soup now 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hahahah
LikeLiked by 2 people
He makes a big mistake leaving his blog unattended when the two of us get together 😈
Still, if he prefers prattling on FB to our delectable company that’s his choice.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Correction: that gray matter stew of his.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Victoria & Roughseas,
This post was inspired by a Saturday evening get-together last night between various age groups or generations, of 6-8 friends and spouses. At first, the comical discussions of Presidential candidates — for BOTH traditional parties — was the theme. However, two older men brought up one particular Presidential candidate that is dominating the press/news. Do I need to name who they were referring? Well, after everyone had already consumed their first two glasses of wine or beer, the laughing about “hair pieces” and “Family Values” represented by this dominating candidate soon turned serious. A couple of minutes later the overly abused word, an all too often gross oversimplification of issues… was used: LIBRALS. And it was NOT used in a positive context. I probably do not need to tell either of you how quickly my pulse and blood-pressure began to rise while my teeth and jaw began tightening and grinding… in silence.
Therefore, to answer both your questions, this post was certainly about politicians not willing to admit on the spot that they honestly have no clue about a certain subject/issue. However, as I sat there listening to this diversely-aged group talk, SUDDENLY the Presidential candidate’s race had 6-8 more candidates, right there in the room! 😉
Then one particular male voice said, “I know candidates during campaigns tell the public what ANY public wants to hear…” he said chuckling. I’m still there in silence thinking Okay, that is true, yes. But he continued… “…but I tell ya, I sure do LIKE what he is saying!” in his most serious face.
Victoria, Roughseas… I guess then I’m referring to both politicians and the/their voters, huh? LOL 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
“6-8 friends and spouses” = “everyone”
Generalize much? 😛
LikeLike
LOL…I realize Victoria I wrote this post, described the entire evening in a few very short paragraphs, did not mention 4-5 other previous discussions I listened in on at a local hardware store between two couples and the store manager, FOX News Channel coverages and commentary on the candidates and their current campaign positions — for the record, a channel I try HARD to never listen to or watch! — and greatly abbreviated these exact discussions last night for the sake of time and length here, as well as abided to my own limited time to write. I apologize for that. 😉
I guess I should’ve kept my mouth shut, or in this case my typing-fingers still(?), if I DIDN’T have an adequate amount of time to write it. Very very questionable journalism, huh? LOL
LikeLiked by 1 person
No apologies necessary, Professor. You know me, I’m a stickler for detail, and I’m an atheist living in the deep red South. “Everyone” here thinks I eat babies. “Everyone” thinks I’m immoral. Everyone thinks I’m not trust worthy.
Can’t imagine why. 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
I believe I’ll answer both of you down below (or up above?) in Victoria’s replies and comments to you Roughseas, and between you. So… see below/above.
LikeLiked by 1 person
😛
LikeLike
Everyone’s entitled to their own opinions, but no one is entitled to their own facts.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well put, John.
LikeLiked by 2 people
John,
Can you PLEASE come here to the U.S., become naturalized and a registered voter, and then begin here a NEW American Renaissance and Age of Enlightenment!!!? Please? 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh my stars! I leave for just a few hours and LOOK what has happened!!! I can’t take you women anywhere in public! 😛
Let me read all these comments and gather my thoughts before I reply to each of you. LOL
LikeLike
I wrote too soon didn’t I? And you certainly wouldn’t get the chance of taking either of us anywhere private 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
LMAO!!! So you say. 😈
LikeLiked by 1 person
In your darkest dreams, sweets. You really think you could manage Victoria AND me? Now that really is one confident ego.
LikeLike
“And you certainly wouldn’t get the chance of taking either of us anywhere private.”
LMAO — True that.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thank you Sir. I’m on a roll today. “Into” instead of “intro”, “his” instead of “that” — hint, hint. 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
LOL! I changed the “into” to “intro”, but did I miss the “his” and “that”? If so, where exactly? I’ll correct it. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much.
LikeLike
The correction of “that” would be at:
N℮üґ☼N☮☂℮ṧ on September 13, 2015 at 10:55 am said:
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve never seen a blogger be so abused and I follow a lot of sites that are littered with Christian trolls. lol Roughseas and Victoria combined are at least a category 5. Best to just evacuate. lol
Well I appreciated your little rant. 🙂 And to answer your question, I think it is okay to talk about things you know nothing about. It’s a good way to start a conversation and learn more. But a better way would be to say “I don’t know anything about this, so let me talk to someone who does”…oh I don’t know like a scientist who studies the climate, and then ask them, and learn and then you could say “Hey I know a lot about this now, I can speak intelligently about it”.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Bwahahaha!!!
“I’ve never seen a blogger be so abused and I follow a lot of sites that are littered with Christian trolls. lol Roughseas and Victoria combined are at least a category 5. Best to just evacuate. lol”
Swarn, you speaketh LOADS of truth & wisdom my friend! Category 5 is like what on the Rectum Scale, Ooops… I mean Richter Scale… 9.9 or 10? Sir, I’ve tried so hard to shake them, lose them, but they just keep coming back! 😉
“But a better way would be to say “I don’t know anything about this, so let me talk to someone who does”…oh I don’t know like a scientist who studies the climate…”
Hah! Can you refer me to one, a BRILLIANT one!? LOL 😛
“…and then you could say “Hey I know a lot about this now, I can speak intelligently about it”.”
You crack me up! Seriously though, about how long would you say is required to say that, AND what sort of investment is required? 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well actually Category 5 is already a scale related to wind speed. The Richter scale is for earthquakes. I believed the Rectum scale is for volcanoes because it always makes me erupt.
In terms how long it would be required to be able to speak intelligently about climate change it depends on whether you want basic expertise, or expert expertise. lol I could give someone the basics in a couple hours…perhaps it would take 10-12 for the person to really know what they are talking about and give talks to someone else and teach them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very good Swarn! The sort of answer I am pleased to hear from you — a good barometer IS indeed whether they could sound intelligent to give a weekend conference at the Gaylord Texan Resort & Convention Center, even better if it’s enjoyable! 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
Swarn, I’m shocked — you of all people encouraging the Professor’s exaggeration skills. LOL
LikeLiked by 3 people
I mean, he lives in Texas…everything is exaggerated there. When you read his posts you are just supposed to automatically translate things to 30-70% smaller. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hahahahhaha
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just LOL. And that’s only his ego to start with. Mmm, the mind runs riot diminishing his attributes. Hey, what’s wrong with me and V? A nicer pair of women one couldn’t hope to meet 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
HAH!!! 😛
LikeLiked by 1 person
You do arrive most unpredictably.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed you are. I also was exaggerating because when I speak to the Professor I also have talk in Texas speak. It’s all about learning to speak the other’s language. lol
I can see your compliments gave him a bloggerection. You might have been right about expanding his head too much. Given how easily he reacts, I’m sure it’s easily deflated again and I am sure you and Victoria can keep him from getting to big for britches. lol
LikeLiked by 2 people
LOL… ya’ll are making me laugh only 30% smaller! 😛
LikeLiked by 3 people
To be serious, I think your point about saying ‘I know nothing about’ is interesting. Assuming you want to learn more. Some people say, go to X subject 101, I’m not here to teach you, and I fall into that category sometimes.
But, what is really bad, is people who purport to know something about subject Y and they talk rubbish. Just. Sheer. Trash.
And for the record, I did make one complimentary comment about the Professor above. I am now about to make another, which is seriously griping me, but I must be honest. He doesn’t usually talk out of his arse and he has been known to ask to learn. Few people do. So annoying to say two nice things about him on one blog post 😦 He’ll be Professor SuperEgo for the next month) he is one of the few men I read on the internet who gets my respect.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Mmmm, I humbly accept these kind words from you. Thank you Darling. The sentiments are mutual. 🙂 ❤
LikeLike
I knew I shouldn’t have written that 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Darling, stop. The cream (truth) always rises to the top anyway. Enjoy it, like I am. 😈
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve stopped I’ve gone, zzz
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree, there has to be a certain self-awareness when “talking out of one’s arse”. There are people who do, but when you converse with them and present your knowledge they are able to change their views. And you do have to have a willingness to learn, whether or not you learn by asking questions or diving right in to discussion. One of my many flaws is that I love to learn and feel everybody else must want to learn as well. As it turns out, semester after semester, this is mostly not the case. But I’ve decided that if there is a place in my life for foolhardy optimism this isn’t a bad one to have. lol
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed Swarn. It’s been my short subjective experience that 90% of the time, things, events, people, existence, are truly “bigger than myself.” That realization is never too far away or tucked too deep in my head… or big head as Roughseas and Victoria like to label. 😉
All one has to do is look up and gaze upon the billions of stars simply within our own galaxy to get a more accurate self-portrayal. And then REVERSE that view! Gaze into a powerful electron-microscope. Between the two views you truly begin to imagine/learn our place in life, in the Multiverse. And we are only here — in this life-dimension — for a few seconds in the Cosmic calendar! LOL 😮
That perspective right there simplifies a shitload for me and my fellow Earthlings! 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
Indeed. And this is why one of the qualities in my series that I wrote, on what makes a good human is humility. Because it’s not necessarily such a crime to talk out of your arse, but it is a clear lack of humility when one refuses to admit it once someone presents you with a more correct view, or at least a perspective supported by evidence.
LikeLiked by 2 people
WHAT!!!? You mean the Earth and Me are NOT the center of the Universe!!!? 😮 😉
And with that rhetorical question exists TIME; a force not all (hyper-impatient) Homo sapiens truly understand or want to grasp in the infinite bigger picture. 😉
P.S. That was a great series by the way! Sorry my limited time prevented me from commenting significantly. The entire series DESERVES careful thoughtful considerations! Post a link here to Part 1 please!
LikeLike