Singular Cause of the American Civil War

Just the other day I found myself in a heated dispute with a married couple in Chattanooga, Tennessee—friends of my wife’s middle brother—about the cause and purpose of the American Civil War. I was astonished by what she (the wife) was yelling saying in the background to me while Sandy and I were speaking on the phone with her brother.

We were only explaining for the third or fourth time to my brother-in-law that we still could not help him with the back-taxes (of 4-years) on their deceased Aunt’s house in Hamilton County Tennessee where the brother now resides. The wife, Sandy, was living and financially helping with payments before we married. Basically, my repeated answer was that the current hyper-inflated Cost of Living in Texas and across the entire U.S. proper was being caused by one man and one party: the President of the United States and his radical sycophant MAGA Republicans. Just our cost of energy and groceries are so exorbitantly high that we run out of money by the 19th or 20th of every month… and have been since February of 2026 when our POTUS ignorantly picked and started a war with Iran and the Straight of Hormuz.

Overhearing what I was telling Sandy’s brother this woman chimed in unsolicited to try and antagonize me over what I was saying to my brother-in-law. She also overheard me saying that “I cannot for the life of me understand WHY several Deep South states still have the Confederate flag or symbols of the 1861 Confederacy within their state flags.” She yelled stated loudly, “We love our Confederate flag here and we love President Trump!” In response I asked, “Does she even realize that she is implying she supports racism and slavery!?” Her uneducated reply? It was:

“You saying that makes YOU the racist!”

Battle of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, July 1–3, 1863, the bloodiest battle of the American Civil War.

Yes, even in this 21st-century there are many, too many, Americans that have been misinformed or intentionally wrongly taught to believe that the American Civil War was NOT fought and lost over slavery, but fought over states rights and centralized power and authority. This bogus belief in false history could not be further from the verified facts and truth. Here is why she and any other Americans defending the Confederate States of America and their motive for starting the Civil War are purely and simply flagrantly wrong. Following are the own written words and declarations of secession of all thirteen Confederate States and two more that were essentially shadow/rump Confederate governments.

โˆผ โˆผ โˆผ ยง โˆผ โˆผ โˆผ

The Causes of Seceding Confederate States 1860-1861

As the quote above states, drafted primarily by Thomas Jefferson—and later revised by John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Robert Livingston, Roger Sherman, and Jefferson—there is no distinction whatsoever between any human race or any human ethnicity. It explicitly states, “all men [and women] are created equal” in God’s eyes and His work on Earth. This fact must be first established and accepted (embraced) by all American citizens then and now. Period. No grey areas.

Precisely, what do the eleven (11) seceding Confederate states say as to why they are seceding from the U.S. Declaration, the U.S. Constitution, and the United States of America that our Founding Fathers drew up only 84-years earlier? In just four words this:

  • Keeping Slavery — and that all men are NOT created equal in God’s eyes/work.
  • States’ Rights — to maintain slavery as an economic model and profit for white plantation owners.

Those reasons, those causes are explicitly stated to protect their institution of slavery. Following are the four major states—Mississippi, Georgia, Texas, and South Carolina—using words defending pro-slavery, followed by the clear centrality of slavery and the states’ rights to keep slavery.

These four leading pro-slavery states go on to express arguments and other concepts and methods from their interpretation of the U.S. Constitution to try and show eight reasons why the protection, expansion, and perpetuation of African-American slavery and white supremacy were the primary drivers of secession. The individual state documents explicitly cite Northern states passing personal liberty laws, nullifying the Fugitive Slave Act 5:

  1. Some states argue that slavery should be expanded as an economic benefit and fair representation in the federal government’s trade and commerce.
  2. Abolitionism is a method of inciting violent uprisings both in the South and among the Northern Confederates.
  3. Mississippi and Georgia point out in their Causes of Secession that slavery accounts for a huge portion of the Southern economy.
  4. The Southern states argue that the Union is a compact, one that can be annulled if the states are not satisfied with what they receive in return from other states and/or from the federal government.
  5. The states argue that the North’s reluctance to enforce the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 (mandating that fugitive slaves be returned to the South) means that the compact is no longer satisfactory.
  6. All of the Southern states negatively mention Abraham Lincoln’s election and his suspected abolitionist leanings.
  7. Georgia accuses Northern manufacturing interests of exploiting the South and dominating the federal government.
  8. Texas expresses dissatisfaction with federal military protection.
Enslaved people and soldiers on a South Carolina plantation in 1862.
Henry P. Moore/LOC/Archive Photos via Getty Images

To further validate the primary cause of the American Civil War, here are the actual explicit written words, their declarations, and causes of secession by the thirteen (13) Confederate States in chronological order defending their right to keep slavery:

South Carolina – Dec. 20-24, 1860

“Confederate States of America – Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union:

Mississippi – January 9, 1861

“A Declaration of the Immediate Causes which Induce and Justify the Secession of the State of Mississippi from the Federal Union:

Florida – January 10, 1861

“Form of Government for the People of Florida – Ordinance of Secession from the Federal Union.

On January 10, 1861, with 62 delegates voting yea and 7 voting nay, the President of Florida’s Secession Convention, John C. McGehee, speaking for the vast majority of Floridians he declared five days earlier:

And remaining in the rule of the federal Union would…

Alabama – January 11, 1861

“An Ordinance to dissolve the union between the State of Alabama and the other States united under the compact styled “The Constitution of the United States of America.”

Georgia – January 19, 1861

A slave market in Atlanta, Georgia, 1864. Library of Congress

The following is the State of Georgia’s Declaration of Secession:

Louisiana – January 26, 1861

“AN ORDINANCE to dissolve the union between the State of Louisiana and other States united with her under the compact entitled “The Constitution of the United States of America.”

By this point in time, January–February 1861, an all new Confederate States of America Constitution was being drafted. The first seven slave-holding states would adopt and ratify the new Constitution on March 11, 1861. The six remaining slave-holding states, Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky, Missouri, and Arkansas would soon follow suit.

Furthermore, to absolutely prove beyond a shadow of doubt that the American Civil War was fought for keeping and the protection of slavery in the South as well as its expansion into other western states, newly appointed President of the Confederate States of America, Jefferson F. Davis, wrote this veto to the Congress in Washington D.C. and its Executive Department:

Texas – February 1, 1861

“AN ORDINANCE To dissolve the Union between the State of Texas and the other States united under the Compact styled “the Constitution of the United States of America.””

Between April 17 and June 8, 1861, the States of Virginia, Arkansas, North Carolina, Tennessee, Missouri, and Kentucky all seceded from the Union, adopted and then ratified their new Constitution of the Confederate States of America therefore keeping their slave property, protecting it, and sought to expand slavery into western territories as far as the Pacific Ocean if possible such as into the Arizona Territory and beyond.

Wealthy white Southern plantation owners along with their white foreman separated from the Union, from the U.S. Declaration of Independence, and the U.S. Constitution to establish a negro slave-commerce which fattened their opulent southern Antebellum lifestyles. Moreover, unlike slavery in the ancient world where servants/slaves were of diverse skin-colors and ethnicities, even Caucasian slaves, in the United States slavery was strictly based on race or skin-color. Leading up to the Civil War blacks were the enslaved people in the South and whites were not.

As of today, October 14, 2026, one hundred and sixty-one years (161) and counting, there are seven state flags in the U.S. that feature explicit symbols, historical references, or structural designs tied to the Confederate States of America and still numerous state monuments and statues celebrating, glorifying the Confederacy’s heroes and cause. Here are those seven states and some of the still standing Confederate sites:

If you would like to review further the more than 685 to 700 Confederate monuments and well over 2,000 total Confederate symbols, including streets, highways, buildings, forts, airbases, and parks still remaining in public spaces nationwide… then start with Wikipedia’s site here. When the former Confederacy and its cause (slavery, racism) is still sanctified today, even as one’s family heritage, and in degrees sanitized so not to appear evil or wrong, what does that teach our youth and American generations that come after? Are they being (intentionally?) taught immoral values?

Most Americans today know full well that defeating Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, and 20th-century fascism, had to be done, if for no other reason than atrocities and war crimes blatantly committed by these two evil powers. The Nazi Holocaust and war crimes by Japan against the Chinese people followed by the “enemies” of The Rising Sun clearly show they both had to be stopped and defeated for their forms of evil prejudice and racism. How is the prejudice, racism, and brutality of the Confederate South any different? It’s not. So why support the former Confederacy and the racist slavery it stood for? Isn’t that the same as exalting Nazism and Imperial Japan?

For these same reasons, why are Americans still believing and supporting racism and prejudice, or rather The Lost Cause? Here’s one reason and I strongly recommend you watch all 7-minutes:

โˆผ โˆผ โˆผ ยง โˆผ โˆผ โˆผ

More than 150-years later in a Pew Research Center poll found in 2011 and still today in 2026 that Americans are somehow still seriously divided over what the American Civil War was fought for and how and why it started. In that 2011 poll about 48% stated the Civil War was mainly about statesโ€™ rights and 38% state it was primarily about slavery. Another 9% thought it was about both issues equally or neither/don’t know. And for some mysterious reason (or is it?) the poll revealed:

How is that possible? We have in American archives across the nation, as I have shown above for anyone to see with their own eyes, all the 1850-1865 original state declarations, ordinances, government correspondence, messages, and personal letters by all the main-players from the Union North and the Confederate South—they all explicitly and implicitly show and read that the institution of slavery and its defense was the #1 cause for the Confederate States to secede and start the Civil War. Anyone who states otherwise is unequivocally wrong and does not know the authenticated, verified historical evidence. Period. This makes one ask, “Were these portions of the U.S. populous, 20th– and 21st-century generations, wrongly and intentionally misguided in school?” Has there been a subtle undercurrent of prejudice and racism being taught in our school systems, in Social Studies and/or History classes?

Since the Civil War, some Southern Americans with some level of ties to the Confederacy have attempted to reframe the main cause of the conflict by focusing on statesโ€™ rights or other issues, such as taxes and tariffs. This may be because itโ€™s painful to accept the truth that millions fought to uphold a cruel and inhuman system. It may be because people want to believe the best about their ancestors, or their state or region. Or it may be due to prejudice. Whatever their rationalizing the historical evidence makes it clear that the American Civil War was fought over the issue of slavery, and that the Confederate cause was the continuation of white supremacy. Plain and simple. Controversy over. Yes, “Learn authentic, corroborated, verified factual history,” not propaganda and racism.


  1. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/primary-sources/declaration-causes-seceding-states#Mississippi โ†ฉ๏ธŽ
  2. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/primary-sources/declaration-causes-seceding-states#Georgia โ†ฉ๏ธŽ
  3. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/primary-sources/declaration-causes-seceding-states#Texas โ†ฉ๏ธŽ
  4. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/primary-sources/declaration-causes-seceding-states#South_Carolina โ†ฉ๏ธŽ
  5. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/reasons-secession โ†ฉ๏ธŽ

The Professorโ€™s Convatorium ยฉ 2025 by Professor Taboo is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

20 thoughts on “Singular Cause of the American Civil War”

  1. I’ve run into these attempts to reframe history — sad and nauseating at the same time. The reframing has, as I’m sure you know, extended to trying to window dress slavery as a kindness to slaves. The truth is that if we go far enough back, all of us have ancestors who were involved in one atrocity or another and we have no obligation to try to justify evil. We take it as it was, as something that we need to acknowledge and if possible correct. In my case, I had ancestors who viewed slavery as a mortal sin and went north to join Union Army. I’m proud of them for making what I see as the right choice.

    That said, the Civil War was manipulated into existence by the “Planter class” of rich southerners, much like the current hardship under Trump traces back to Texas oilmen today. The parallels are striking.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Vic, thanks so much for your comment and thoughts. Please stop by anytime to contribute; I’d appreciate that. ๐Ÿ™‚

      I agree wholeheartedly with every word you’ve stated. I too had similar (identical?) ancestors here in Texas during its Republic years followed by the annexation into the slave-holding South and Confederacy. In fact Vic, my maternal Waldensian family (Bonnet Clan of Chambons-Mentoulles of Cluson Valley, Italy and Lyon, France) built a monument that still stands in Comfort, Texas:

      I am a proud anti-racist, anti-slavery, pro-Union descendant! ๐Ÿ˜‰

      Like

      • There were several pockets of resistance in the South, largely in highlands areas where cotton wasn’t viable and there were no rich planters around to control the narrative. I’m sure you know this. West Virginia exists as a state for this reason, even though it’s gone MAGA in the last several years. Eastern Tennessee and Kentucky were also points of resistance as were parts of Northern Alabama. It took serious mental gymnastics to get poor whites to sacrifice for slavery, which simply served to reduce the value and income from free labor — in a lot of places that worked, some it didn’t. Racism is the legacy of that PR campaign.

        Interestingly, one of my insurance clients, a teacher who moved from the Northeast to Georgia and then left the US for Saudi. She affirmed that there is no racism in the Middle East based on skin color. It’s simply not a thing there. Which implies that it doesn’t have to be a thing here either. It’s something some of us carry forward without thought, apparently.

        Of course, the Sauds also provide free healthcare and free education (including grad school). Imagine that.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Ark, would you agree with me that if any American still exalts, still glorifies the Confederate South and its “heroes,” and its many, many monuments, etc., and its sole cause (racism/slavery)… by default admits and/or supports immoral history then and the behavior today?

      Like

      • Of course. We have similar issues here. But whereas SA democracy is relatively new the US had a couple of centuries. One has to wonder what causes such generational racism to persist?

        Liked by 1 person

        • “One has to wonder what causes such generational racism to persist?”

          Well, it persisted during the Jim Crow Era (1800s to 1960s), the Civil Rights Era (1950s to 1970s), and now persists because of one asinine, racist fake prez (DJT) in the White House—for two terms!—and initiated by The Lost Cause and Daughters of the Confederacy, all of which are taught, either overtly or covertly, in the South and Midwest.

          Like

          • Oh well. Anyway.. On the bright side, now that Donny is hell bent on sucking Putin’s D… Oops, silly me. I mean buying diesel . Maybe you lot can learn to hate Russians? Or, in case the US becomes a new Russian State, learn to speak Russian?

            Like

  2. โ€œWe love our Confederate flag here and we love President Trump!โ€

    As we southronners are wont to say — LAWD AH MERCY! Rehashing the slavery thing as the primary cause for The War of Northern Aggression is beyond boring for me personally. The answer to this has always been YES, DUH-UH! The whole thing was an ill conceived, ill planned, ill orchestrated defense of an immoral lifestyle that had already been abandoned years earlier and left to their colonies by our ‘ropean forebears.

    The war began by attacking Ft.Sumter, and ended disastrously. But, The South couldn’t accept that and started rationalizing. 165 years later, and some of us are still fighting it.

    Being a native of the southronest most state of the original 13 colonies, and born in its capital city of Thrasherville/Terminus/Marthasville, I have the bona fides to proclaim this statement by the wife is hilariously cringe.

    I never ceases to amaze me that beginning in the 70s and 80s, southronners began following Yankee carpetbagger Republicans.My grandfathers woulda been appalled.

    Liked by 1 person

    • ๐Ÿ˜„ When I read your comment out to the wife phonetically she kept laughing at how Southronner you sound! She busted out hysterically at “LAWD AH MERCY!” and I chuckled… cuz I can sound just like a Southronner Texas redneck. ๐Ÿ˜‰

      So Kamchak, we Googled Thrasherville (Georgia) and Marthasville (Missouri?), but we weren’t real sure of WHERE your native, most southern colony (of the 13) you hail from. Is it “Joe-jah,” i.e. the Peach state?

      Like

      • Yes, Georgia.

        John Thrasher built a small settlement in the woods which would mark the terminus of the railroad. That area is now downtown Atlanta. Governor Lumpkin renamed “Terminus” to Marthasville to honor his daughter Martha.

        Some added context (which I think I’ve posted here, before): at the 1787 Constitutional Convention, the slave states waited until the very end to decide on the census thingie. The delegates were tired and wanted to go home when the southerners purdy much held the whole kit and caboodle hostage — “Nice Representative Republic ya got here, be a damn shame if anything were to happen to it”. They wanted all the slaves to be included in the census (insuring a higher number of HoR representatives) despite the fact that slaves were chattel. The north shoulda argued that based on that logic all livestock in all states should be counted. Everybody wanted to go home, so the 3/5ths compromise was reached. In 1787 the south agreed to the negotiated terms and signed the documents which ensured a unified nation. When they fired on Ft. Sumter 70 years later, that displayed it was a bad faith agreement.

        Like

    • Well rawgod, in my understanding and deep studies of our Charters of Freedom—as a Social Studies/History educator for years as well as my hobby of passion—I’ve been a proponent of a New U.S. Constitution for the 21st- and 22nd-centuries. Our 18th-century Constitution is way, way antiquated and no longer (truly) works For the People! Furthermore, today far too many political attorneys have always (and will continue) to found/find loopholes and get-arounds. That’s why our Core Founding Fathers made much or a lot of the Constitution OPEN for Amendments to advance and progress with the times. Sadly, most of those political lawyers—both in practice and in our Legislative Branch and Supreme Court—are Originalist Conservatives that DO NOT want the laws of the land changing. They use every possible scheme or trick to keep us in the 18th-century; keep the status quo because that keeps the white man in control… even though they are now a minority in this country! ๐Ÿ˜ 

      All that to say rawgod, YES… the U.S. Constitution MUST be rewritten for the 21st- and 22nd-century—perhaps parts of the 23rd-century. ๐Ÿ™‚

      Like

        • BWAAAAA! ๐Ÿ˜„ Funny you should ask that…

          For American Pro-Gun Pro-Violence Originalists blog-post of July 2022.

          That post essentially tells fanatical gun-enthusiacists and pro-gun, pro-arsenal of mass weapons WHAT the 18th-century Constitution and the Second Amendment was meant to give right to bear arms… in the EFFIN 18th-century! Not the 21st-century with high-capacity magazines and military-combat style weapons that will wipe out 30-40 victims/targets in minutes! I mean, DUH!!! There was absolutely no way our Founding Fathers could’ve ever predicted the type weapons we build now and sell to whomever has the right money despite their possibly psychiatric/psychological dysfunctions and more and more body-bags.

          The mentality today regarding weapons & carrying, etc., in the U.S. is just pure stupidity. Period. ๐Ÿ˜ก

          Like

      • No need to rush things that cannot be perceived yet, but certainly there is a huge need to update the Constitution. I don’t know enough to say whether the Declaration needs updating, it is a historical document despite its obvious errors. But certainly some words need to be redefined.

        MEN — All persons of the human species, no matter of sex, gender, racial origin, religion or no religon, monetary worth, and political or non-political stance, including other differences as needed in the future.

        ARMS — Includes any type of weapon that releases projectiles at speed with the purpose of harming a human or a non-human. Present examples would include air-driven projectiles of all natures throwing axes and knives, bows or crossbows and their arrows, slingshots, bb guns, hand-held guns or pistols, automatic guns , rifles, all types of machine guns, rifles, cannons, torpedoes, etc. and all kinds of harm or death-dealing instruments yet to be crested.

        Like

        • Oops, accidentally hit send. But I think I made my point on what can be defined as a projectile weapon. I would like to add all explosive weapons such dynamite/TNT/Nitroglycerin phosphorus, and mines, grenades or weapons of similar types, drone-delivered weapons, ballistic and intercontinental ballistic missiles, rocket-powered missiles, bombs of all natures, sizes, and strengths including chemical and atomic and neutron or other such type of weapon.

          Ending off any kind of hand-held weapon of simplistic designed for normal activities but used as weapons — axes, bats, pipes, hockey sticks, boomerangs, animal traps, etc. etc. etc. AND anything else, including robotics, or AI designed weapons we cannot imagine at this time.

          Liked by 1 person

  3. I wonder if those right-wing, confederate-flag waving degenerates realise that the rectangular piece of cloth they display, is based on the square battle flag used by Robert E. Lee’s army during the civil war (to prevent confusion on the battlefield), and not the flag of the Confederate States of America (of which there were officially, three).

    On the other hand, perhaps they do know the difference and want to be seen as combatants, rather than civilians.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Lenny, can’t argue with any of your points. Your deductions and hypotheses are right. I have found far, far too many adult Americans poorly—even illiterate—when it comes to a comprehensive study and full understanding of American history and all the causes and effects. Hell, and most of those Americans, particularly the MAGA-base Trumpians, only have either a high school diploma (or GED) and simply can’t fully comprehend how poorly and often wrongly they were taught in school. There will also be a noticeable percentage of those MAGA-Trumpians that were home-schooled by their parent(s) which is NOT (and never will be) a high quality education. Period.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Reading through the comments of folk that have to live and breathe this debate I am reticent to say too much lest put my Brit Feet ‘in it’. Just a few modest observations then.

    1. I read in one account that many men from the North and North West of the USA joined the Union army not so much for concerns over the slaves, but that in the growing Free Market economy salve owning gave southern employers an unfair advantage over northern competitors who had to pay wages (albeit merge ones) to all the work force.

    2. During Lee’s 1863 Eastern Theatre offensive which ended at Gettysburg as the Confederates matched into northern territory they appropriate resident African Americans as war booty and shipped them south to the slave markets.(Kind of smears the idea of the Confederate High Water mark, doesn’t it?)

    3. Well of course they would want to re-write history wouldn’t they? Which nation or large collection of folk doesn’t want to cover up their past dirty deeds and questionable acts with a layer of Romantic Lost Causes, Pseudo Nobility and only them being hard-done by? Why ever since this continent discovered Nationalism it’s been quite the busy cottage industry over here in Europe.

    OK
    I’m done.

    Roger
    (‘reticent to say too much lest put my Brit Feet ‘in it’. Just a few modest observations then’….Ha! Try and get a Welshman to shut up- about anything!)

    Liked by 1 person

Go Ahead, Start the Discussion!