2017: Our Past, Present, & Forecast

Surprise! I am not a fan of horse-blinders, headless ostriches, or one-tree forests. I am not a fan of shallow, baseless rhetoric or opinion unless it is cleverly woven with satire and parody. Nor am I a fan of closed systems and strong-armed boxing in. Are you asking “What on Earth is he going on about?” Fair question.

What 2017 will become for Americans, and hopefully to a minimal extent the world, will be or has been partly determined by 2015-16, the state-of-the-Union and its unionists today, and what will result in 2018 and 2019 based on the past and present. This is the final post from the previous:  2016: Cries for Mutiny.

* * * * * * * * * *
(line break)

The Past Two Years

2015 and 2016 in America saw many economic, political, social, and scientific headlines, many good as there were bad. Following are some of the biggest and in my opinion most impactful relative to the well-being of all U.S. citizens and citizens to be.

Racism, lethal violence, and gun-control, and so by default our nation’s outrageous incarceration rate, seems to never go away. The mass shootings at Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, SC and the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, FL, a popular LGBT club, were two of the deadliest shootings in recent history. The Charleston Church shooting was reportedly motivated by a 21-year old white supremacist charged with 33 counts including murder, firearms charges, and federal hate-crime charges. The murderer’s beliefs prompted continued debate over the state’s long history of flying the 19th century Confederate Battle Flag atop the state capitol building. This shooting and other similar shootings in the U.S. including the Pulse nightclub—and Roseburg, Lafayette, Chattanooga, Planned Parenthood, San Bernardino—ignited again the still never-ending controversy of racism and gun-control.


The phrase Black Lives Matter became a common trending 2015 hashtag on social media following events such as the death of 25-year old Freddie Gray while in custody. Increased police violence and killing continued throughout 2016, primarily toward or effecting African-Americans, shockingly suggesting that the end of the American Civil War in 1865, the ratification of the 13th Amendment also in 1865, then decades later historical victories by the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960’s and 70’s never happened! It seriously begs the question whether basic human rights in America have really taken firm roots after 151 years!

On a high note, in 2015 June 26th, the White House vowed its support for the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in favor of marriage equality for same-sex couples. President Obama remarked:

“In my second inaugural address, I said that if we are truly created equal, then surely the love we commit to one another must be equal as well. It is gratifying to see that principle enshrined into law by this decision.”

But American history has shown that simple moral, ethical equality for all is still far from established, practiced, and protected within our national borders, e.g. Texas Rep. Andrew Murr in my previous post. And America is not always so embracing when it comes to foreigners and foreign affairs, despite what Lady Liberty is supposed to symbolize to the world.


The European refugee crisis from war-torn nations like Syria have been an embarrassing blemish across Lady Liberty and all Americans. Tens of thousands of people fleeing from the Middle East and Africa learned harshly just how paranoid and apathetic the United States has become. Germany, Sweden, and the U.K. on the other hand opened up their arms wide taking in far more than President Obama’s plan to allow 10,000. Other foreign aid into those warring nations reached all-time highs and lows for the international community despite U.S. peace and refusal talks. Yet, these refugee figures come out of European and American sources — the numbers are anywhere between 1.1 to 4.4 million refugees in African nations, ironically where some of the poorest nations in the world are located. Hmmmm.

The U.S. economy made several headlines as well, no surprise given the upcoming Presidential primaries and election in 2016. The federal deficit indeed shrunk over 2015. The final figures came in at $439 billion, about $45 billion less than in 2014. Employment rose, unemployment fell, and for the first time in the past 7-years, 2015’s real hourly pay climbed faster than 2%. Good news, yes. However, America’s widening zip code inequality continued to rise as poverty and a lack of upward mobility became not just social and economic problems, they became bigger geographical ones too. American living standards only saw limited gains creating a false illusion of recovery. This was reflected by a contraction of aggregate supply rather than a strong expansion of demand, all according to the Brookings Institute. Therefore, now is an easy segway into America’s federal politics and “Election 2016″… a campaign year that would go down in history as infamous, to put it mildly.

In an April 2015 two-minute video, Democrat Hillary Clinton announced her anticipated second run for president. With Democratic candidates Sanders and Clinton set, the race for the Republican nomination became a wild free-for-all. Another Bush from Florida entered the race, Jeb Bush, along with no less than 15 others, including the TV-reality star and business mogul Donald Trump. From that point on, the fiery “You’re Fired!” TV personality turned the campaigns into polarizing, even comical, reality shows. Soon after, as if to get in line for the next blockbuster show, rapper Kanye West proclaimed he would run in the 2020 presidential election. Why not! Come one, come all. No experience necessary.

In November 2016, what can only be described as a stunning outcome, Trump won not the popular vote, but the Electoral College vote to become the 45th President of the United States. Yes, the rest of the world was shocked, not shocked, and Vladimir Putin and Russia loved it.

In late 2016 the Brookings Institute spoke about Trump’s economic team forecasting doubled long-term GDP as “unrealistic.”

“Labor force growth is slowing to a crawl. The population is aging, the dramatic advance of women into the labor market is waning, and male participation has been declining for decades. We will be lucky if the labor force grows by 0.5 percent a year. That means labor productivity growth would have to grow by 3 percent a year.  Over the past decade, it grew by just over 1 percent.  So the Trump administration seems to be assuming that they can more than double productivity growth. So, is a near-doubling of the GDP growth rate realistic? No. But even if it were, it would be less important than ensuring that whatever growth we have is more equally distributed. But let’s assume we can bump up the growth rate.  Even then, unless something is done to ensure that growth is more broadly distributed, the average American is unlikely to benefit very much. This lesson was reinforced recently by the release of new data showing that, on average, if you were born in 1940, you had a 90 percent chance of being better off than your parents, but the odds fell to 50 percent if you were born in the 1980s. Both lower growth and rising inequality contributed to this depressing story for today’s younger generations. In addition, the study—by Raj Chetty and colleagues—found that more equally distributing growth would be more effective at improving the average person’s life chances than simply restoring GDP growth to its golden years’ rate. In fact, in today’s lopsided economy, it would take a growth rate of more than 6 percent to revive the income trajectories experienced by middle class children in 1940.”

But don’t fret too much America. There are some very bright spots from 2015-16!


A shattered chromosome cured a woman of her immune disease then reassembled. This is known as chromothripsis, possibly paving the way for therapies against a variety of human diseases. 2015 saw the dawn of gene editing, the rise of immunotherapy and the first hints of a drug to slow the pace of Alzheimer’s disease. NASA’s Kepler telescope found 1,284 new planets of which nine could plausibly support human life. About 800-million years ago a slight genetic mutation lead to multicellular life on Earth. An ancient molecule known as GK-PID was discovered to be the reason single-celled organisms on Earth started evolving into multicellular organisms we have today. In mathematics a new prime number was discovered, further expanding and enhancing encryption programming:  the Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search. Then perhaps one of the biggest headline for medical science in 2016 was made by the Stanford University School of Medicine! Stem cells injected into stroke patients re-enabled patients to walk again.


Finally and on the faith vs. science debate, cavefish were found that could walk up walls. This showed similarities to four-limbed vertebrates. The New Jersey Institute of Technology discovered a Taiwanese Cavefish that is capable of walking up walls with the same anatomical movement as any present-day amphibian or reptile. And in the state of Utah, the Black Dragon Canyon rock-art debate was finally solved! Due to pterosaur fossils being found in the area, young-Earth creationists — who believe our planet to be only 6,000 to 10,000 years old — have relentlessly cited the rock-painting as proof that humans and the winged reptiles had walked the region together. Archaeological chemist Dr. Marvin Rowe using a photographic enhancement program known as DStretch and a technique called x-ray fluorescence,” completely debunked the creationist’s claim of the art.

There were many, many more major breakthroughs in medicine, history, and science for 2015-16 that simply could not all be listed here. Apologies.

The Present

The reviews are mixed about 2017. No surprise, right? It’s only January.

However, from a U.S. economic standpoint, the fiscal outlook for America’s “new POTUS” plans are not promising, says the Brookings Institute, and it is likely to get worse soon.

“The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates that Trump’s tax and spending proposals – the latter including replacing the Affordable Care Act, modifying Medicaid, boosting military spending, and enacting savings in non-defense programs – imply that the debt will rise to 105 percent of GDP by 2026. The CRFB report leaves out any estimate of increased infrastructure spending, which Trump has said he would like to increase by roughly $1 trillion over a decade. Including that would add further to the debt figures.”

From a political standpoint, never before has the spirit of true, pure equality for ALL Americans been so threatened (e.g. 2016: Cries for Mutiny), arguably weakened the last 2-3 decades. Racism and hate-crimes littered our nation’s news media and if 2015-16 is any barometer, it isn’t going away anytime soon in 2017. For here and now and the sake of time, I am going to focus on sex-gender identities only.


Notwithstanding the obvious growing social trend of sex-gender equality across many states, the political-Conservative representation and processes, for various reasons, progressed at snail-paces. It took the highest court in the land, the Supreme Court, after four pivotal landmark decisions—Lawrence v. Texas (2003), United States v. Windsor (2013), Hollingsworth v. Perry (2013), and Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)—to make same-sex marriage legal in all 50 states. Can you say it took not an act of Congress, but the gavel of the Supreme Court to finally follow its majority of people!?

From the social and scientific standpoints then, the future in America has wider glimmers of hope. Since 1991 the work of doctors and scientists — like Dr. Simon LeVay and medical/university colleagues across Massachusetts and New York with their supporting universities and clinics through 2001 — has led to the progression and evolution of tangible better understandings of sex-gender dynamics. For example, in 2006 the Council for Responsible Genetics reported:

“We are sexual beings, yet this does not mean that we are born homosexual, bisexual, or heterosexual. Our sexual expression can change over time, towards different people, through different experiences. A lack of understanding about this type of human variability often leads to a perspective that our genes define who we are.

…Yet a narrow focus on the variability of sexual expression threatens to cloud the issue altogether. Without giving proper attention to the mutability of human sexual expression, questions regarding its origins and character cannot be answered. Without giving proper attention to the mutability of human sexual expression, questions regarding its origins and character cannot be answered.”

Brief on Sexual Orientation and Genetic Determinism, May 2006, citation Jan. 5, 2017 at http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/ViewPage.aspx?pageId=66

Then by 2015 more results were in…

“For men, new research suggests that clues to sexual orientation may lie not just in the genes, but in the spaces between the DNA, where molecular marks instruct genes when to turn on and off and how strongly to express themselves.”

In individuals, said [UCLA molecular biologist Tuck C.] Ngun, the presence of these distinct molecular marks can predict homosexuality with an accuracy of close to 70%.

Researchers working in the young science of epigenetics acknowledge they are unsure just how an individual’s epigenome is formed. But they increasingly suspect it is forged, in part, by the stresses and demands of external influences. A set of chemical marks that lies between the genes, the epigenome changes the function of genetic material, turning the human body’s roughly 20,000 protein-coding genes on or off in response to the needs of the moment.

“Our best guess is that there are genes” that affect a man’s sexual orientation “because that’s what twin studies suggest,” said Northwestern University psychologist J. Michael Bailey, who has explored a range of physiological markers that point to homosexuality’s origins in the womb. But the existence of identical twin pairs in which only one is homosexual “conclusively suggest that genes don’t explain everything,” Bailey added.”

Scientists find DNA differences between gay men and their straight twin brothers, by Melissa Healy – LA Times, October 2015

Stepping back from any one tree and examining the genetic or epigenetic forest strongly suggests that ancient and long-standing social-theological traditions of strictly an unbending binary paradigm in post-modern Europe and modern America are fast fading into fallacy. For the future growth of higher human virtues and education, this is great news!


This very month one of the most iconic American magazines, National Geographic, released their double-issues on the gender revolution. Since I can remember over the last 25+ years, this bold highly controversial step by a world-renown organization is long overdue in the U.S.! It paints the reality of the changing social stigma of sex-gender identity bringing it to our public squares to define the correct precise terms so misunderstood, and looks closely at the cultural, political, social, and most importantly the biological aspects! These are must copies for your personal library.

Topics the magazines cover include Helping Families Talk About Gender, Girls, Boys, and Gendered Toys, the power and influence of our society’s binary Color Code on American children, a deeper look into children’s animated films of popular characters:  Who’s the Fairest?, a detailed graph of Where In the World Are Women and Men Most-and Least-Equal, candid first-hand reports from 9-year olds around the globe of How (in their countries) Gender Affects Their Lives, Rethinking Gender: Can Science Help Us Navigate?, and then the lengthy article, Making A Man: How Does A 21st-century Boy Reach Manhood? that I found astonishing. And those articles and graphs are merely the first-half of the first magazine!

“Enveloped by the men of his family and Hasidic faith, Levi Tiechtel celebrates his 13th birthday at his bar mitzvah in Queens, New York. For millenia, Jews have been performing this ritual, which commemorates the [supposed] age when a male becomes accountable for his own actions and sins.”

Making A Man: How Does A 21st-century Boy Reach Manhood?, January 2017 National Geographic, pp 86-87.

From 800 BCE Sparta to 1930 Italy and United States, “cultures have devised [not genetics or epigenetics necessarily] myriad practices and rituals to make boys into men. The methods — often secret and sacred — vary widely and continually evolve, says cultural anthropologist Gilbert Herdt. But they also share some universal themes that broadly reflect a community’s values and the roles its men are expected to play.” At such a young malleable age, in several cultures around the world, America included, it makes the decision to conform or not conform daunting or near impossible until perhaps an older age of increased independence and exposure to the world’s endless variety.

The Possible-Probable Forecast

Based on what I’ve written in this post and previous posts, my life experiences as an 8th-generation Texan as well as American, my 28-year futebol-soccer career across 4-of-the-6 inhabitable continents exposed and engrossed to a multitude of native cultures, the copiousness and curse of the internet, and my unconventional journey from young agnostic, to evangelical-fundamental Reformed theology with church leadership and practice, back toward a Freethinking Humanist today… and now an evolving, learning, and hopefully teaching social-sciences from basic chemistry to Quantum Physics, I would say the next 2-6 years in the United States looks promising through several lenses on the social and scientific fronts, but ominous on the economic and political battlefields. Why?

After 241-years as a nation and about 182 for Texas, we have nurtured the freedom to continually push the envelope of social refinement and scientific exploration, granted in pockets of the country, while also nurturing the fear of change and the consumer rewards of self-reliance and exclusion. When we examine the entire American forest over the lifetime of our nation, we stand at a pivotal ridge on our future’s horizon. Either we embrace a bigger global community, reverse the return or nuisance of old uncivilized ideologies which have crept or will creep back in, and instead keep pushing the scientific thresholds… else we risk increased fragmentation, polarization, and socioeconomic collapse in  a few more generations, if not sooner.

I hope my seat behind this windshield and the view through my/our rearview mirror is different or temporarily malfunctioning! (half laughing, half nervous)

Tell me your thoughts and suggestions below. Whether you are American or not, I’d like to read them.

(paragraph break)

Live Well — Love Much — Laugh Often — Learn Always

Creative Commons License
This work by Professor Taboo is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at www.professortaboo.com/contact-me/.

15 thoughts on “2017: Our Past, Present, & Forecast

  1. A remarkably comprehensive analysis of the state of affairs, Professor! It’s a mixed bag, isn’t it? Social Liberalism is in the ascendency, and yet the most Socially Conservative administration conceivable has been elected. The deficit has been reduced (but has it? – see FT link*), whilst national and personal debt increases. Medical Science advances, yet the squeezed middle classes are reluctant to fund healthcare for the poor. The inequality gap widens, perpetuated in part by the global labour arbitrage exploited by corporates and which, somewhat curiously, the middle classes either deem a good thing, or tacitly sign up to in their voting choices. I suppose one notable shift over the past couple years, and which you didn’t mention due (no doubt) to space constraints, has been the waning and leaching of confidence in Western Democracies and legislative systems. Trust has evaporated. Europe is collapsing. NATO is under threat. Proto-Fascism is rearing its head and the U.S. has elected a reality TV star as its leader. Who knows how things will unfold, but my guess is that it will get messy before it gets better.

    * https://www.ft.com/content/84539cf4-bed2-11e5-846f-79b0e3d20eaf
    * http://www.usdebtclock.org/

    P.S. Isn’t a ‘Segway’ an electric scooter? 😉


    • Ahh Hariod, my good friend. What took me almost 3,000 words to convey, you’ve bulleted several critical points & observations in what(?)… 150 words? Hahaha! YOU’RE HIRED! Get your buttocks over here now and be my Ghost-writer! 😛 😉

      Seriously, you are correct that I indeed had time & space (and brain-power?) constraints. I could’ve easily written 3,000 more words just about the sex-gender revolution and Earth-Quantum sciences! Grrrrrrr. 😦 It’s a dilemma, a conundrum to NOT get swept away in the popular social-media trend of 3-minute attention spans and one (perhaps half?) shallow topic. I fight that battle even here in Texas with local strangers or acquaintances who seem to be “comfortably numb” talking about the weather (not climate-change mind you) or reality-TV shows & stars. Making most everyone laugh about life is about as ‘shallow’ as I’ll go with anyone, but blabbing about hyper-information that isn’t engaging? Ugh, pinch me if I start to snore! 😛 LOL

      Thank you so very much for your links and feedback Hariod! I very much look forward to reading/watching them. ❤

      P.S. Isn’t a ‘Segway’ an electric scooter?😉

      Has anyone ever told you that you deserve a kick in the arse sometimes!? 😛

      Liked by 1 person

    • Apologies Hariod, but that first link required me to subscribe to the Financial Times in order to read content, your link. I won’t be able to do that, sorry. 😦

      The 2nd link was quite convenient for up-to-the-second numbers & balances! Thank you! I shall use that site in the future! I’m not at all familiar with that “org”… organization’s reputation: U.S. Debt Clock. What are YOUR impressions?

      Also, you mentioned an intriguing point the “…the waning and leaching of confidence in Western Democracies and legislative systems. Trust has evaporated.” Please elaborate on that for me and anyone interested here when and if you have time. I’m very curious! Thank you. 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

      • Ah, sorry about the link, but n’er mind. The FT seems to be the last decent newspaper over here, but it does have a paywall. If you know the names of articles, more or less, then you can just search them and then get behind it. Or Gillian Tett (excellent!) provides free links to good FT pieces on Twitter. As to the veracity of the Debt Clock website, then clearly it’s using averaging algorithms and forward predicting, but it does give a feel for by what means and how fast the National Debt is accumulating.

        As to the leaching of confidence that I alluded to, then it seems quite apparent that the old centre ground, forged and fed during and as a consequence of the Regan/Thatcher axis, is collapsing. I think many are sensing that Western democracies (and their economic models) are propping themselves up using smoke and mirrors – QE, ZIRP, asset price inflation, consumption fuelled by personal debt – but that despite this the squeeze is still on, and is increasingly being felt. I think there’s a broad sense that our leaders have run out of ideas, and something of a vacuum is being created in the former Centre. Naturally, the extremes – both Left and Right – will then fill the void, even if voters don’t fully embrace the ideologies, or take the hustings pledges literally, as I strongly suspect is so with many Trump supporters. Even Merkel, the bastion of European Centrism, is struggling.

        I see a great erosion of confidence in the old institutions: the EU, IMF, UN, Central Banks, the historical major political parties, the mainstream media, security services, legal and law enforcement systems, etc. It’s got to the point where voters are prepared to throw the dice, take big risks with unknowns, and cock a snook at the established order. Yes, I would say that trust has evaporated, and don’t think that’s overstating the case. It shouldn’t have taken much trust amongst the electorate for Clinton to have won against Trump, but even many of those who voted for her in her loss still only did so reluctantly – how many really believed in her? It’s the same story in Europe, and if Le Pen wins in a few weeks time then it could hasten the end of the EU. It’s not just Texas that wants to go its own way!


        • …but it does give a feel for by what means and how fast the National Debt is accumulating.

          It certainly does; a very good feel. Thank you! Watching those figures go up or down, including Texas’ numbers, the tax revenues vs. debts I found particularly fascinating (troubling). This is what has ALWAYS bewildered me Hariod regarding those 2 “scales” I mentioned: being one of, if not the wealthiest nation(s) in the world, WHY do we have (and have had) such gross economic inequality in the world per capita!?

          With regard to your last two(?) paragraphs, they are an excellent summarization of dominate Western civilizations afraid of changing traditions, paradigms, and/or systems of socioeconomic-political affect in order to keep up with an increasingly GLOBAL community! Well done Sir! 😀

          It’s not just Texas that wants to go its own way!

          Exactly! When most barometers and hindsights repeatedly & glaringly infer… not a tribal, regional, imperialistic-national autonomous existence, but a global species and coexistence… much/most of history has shown horribly the results of stubborn (violent?) autonomy. 😦

          Liked by 1 person

    • Thank you Jeff. Because I wanted those two posts finished early this month — not in March or April (LOL) — I really PUSHED (hastily) through several critical topics that I still feel demanded more attention, more detail, but I was just unable to find the time. :/ Sorry.

      Nevertheless, many thanks for reading them Sir.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Excellent perspective and attitude John. Hopefully 8- or 4-years will limit the damage that is likely immanent, unless empeachment occurs before. But as a life-long American, the reality isn’t that tRump is the (potential?) problem, it is our average-educated citizenry being UNABLE to counter-move on all public & private levels the upper 10% – 20% who own those Citizen United corporations and businesses that figured out over the decades HOW to create legislation and legislators to “favor” their interests.

      As most all of history has repeatedly and adequately proven… “Power & wealth tends to corrupt, and absolute power & wealth corrupts absolutely.” American principles are now a dying virtue, especially from the upper-classes. :/


  2. Pingback: 2016: Cries for Mutiny | The Professor's Convatorium

Go Ahead, Start the Discussion!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s